Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form

Stefan Haustein (haustein@ls8.cs.uni-dortmund.de)
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 17:19:36 +0100

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: David Megginson: "Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form"
• Previous message: Richard Anderson: "Re: SAX2: Which license?"
• In reply to: John Cowan: "Re: SAX2: Which license?"
• Next in thread: David Megginson: "Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form"
• Reply: David Megginson: "Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form"

> Comments?  If there is anything approaching agreement (or even
> grudging acceptance), I can try to get out a beta this week with SAX1
> adapters.


I assume that xmlns and xmlns:* attributes do not occur in the
Attributes object, right?

Is "no namespace" reported with a null or empty String (for interned
Strings, 
the equals problem does not exist)?

Can I assume that namespace URIs are always interned?

Thanks for all the work.

Best regards,

Stefan

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)

• Next message: David Megginson: "Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form"
• Previous message: Richard Anderson: "Re: SAX2: Which license?"
• In reply to: John Cowan: "Re: SAX2: Which license?"
• Next in thread: David Megginson: "Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form"
• Reply: David Megginson: "Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Jan 10 2000 - 16:23:12 GMT