Re: W3C policy [Was: Microsoft's responce ...]

David Brownell (david-b@pacbell.net)
Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:54:04 -0800

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Tim Bray: "RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article"
• Previous message: Ann Navarro: "RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article"
• In reply to: Aleksi Niemelä: "RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article"
• Next in thread: David Brownell: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C"

Several folk pointed out, using various words, that

> 	 The W3C's
> secrecy policies are there because it is a treaty organization of
> competitors, not a friendly group of collaborators.  

Ah, so it's like the IEEE or IETF, just not open?

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Next message: Tim Bray: "RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article"
• Previous message: Ann Navarro: "RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article"
• In reply to: Aleksi Niemelä: "RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article"
• Next in thread: David Brownell: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Jan 17 2000 - 19:22:59 GMT