Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)

David Brownell (david-b@pacbell.net)
Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:06:43 -0800

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Steven Champeon: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C"
• Previous message: Tim Bray: "Re: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?)"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Champion: "Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?)"
• Next in thread: Didier PH Martin: "RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)"
• Next in thread: Didier PH Martin: "RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)"
• Next in thread: Tyler Baker: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C"
• Reply: Didier PH Martin: "RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)"

Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> At 09:33 AM 1/21/00 -0500, Didier PH Martin wrote:
> >If we say that the margin of error of this sample is 10% , it means that at
> >least 31% of the browsers in the population sampled has an XML browser, not
> >bad. So, if we make the right inferences:
> 
> That's only if you think that IE5 counts as an XML browser, realistically.
> I don't. -Tim

Two words:  links, lists.  IE5 handles neither its XML/CSS support.

I happen to use both of them constantly in content I produce.  Doing
without is not an option.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@ic.ac.uk the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Next message: Steven Champeon: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C"
• Previous message: Tim Bray: "Re: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?)"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Champion: "Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?)"
• Next in thread: Didier PH Martin: "RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)"
• Next in thread: Didier PH Martin: "RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)"
• Next in thread: Tyler Baker: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C"
• Reply: Didier PH Martin: "RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jan 22 2000 - 06:11:11 GMT