Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)

Len Bullard (cbullard@hiwaay.net)
Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:30:43 -0600

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Len Bullard: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C"
• Next message: Len Bullard: "Re: XML for 3D geometry and objects"
• Previous message: Len Bullard: "Re: My browser is longer than your browser"
• In reply to: David Megginson: "My browser is longer than your browser"
• Next in thread: Tim Bray: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)"
• Next in thread: Tyler Baker: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C"

Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> That's only if you think that IE5 counts as an XML browser, realistically.
> I don't. -Tim

Sad, because in the near to mid term, the dominant implementations will
more 
effectively define XML than XML1.0. So, vote with your feet if you 
must, but choose to lose.

OTOH, those non-browser web apps which use XML might also vote with 
their feet.

len



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@ic.ac.uk the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Next message: Len Bullard: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C"
• Next message: Len Bullard: "Re: XML for 3D geometry and objects"
• Previous message: Len Bullard: "Re: My browser is longer than your browser"
• In reply to: David Megginson: "My browser is longer than your browser"
• Next in thread: Tim Bray: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)"
• Next in thread: Tyler Baker: "Re: Alternatives to the W3C"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jan 22 2000 - 19:00:10 GMT