★ wanayoo — archive 1999 http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/cth245.htmNouvelle recherche | Portail wanayoo



  Auctions.com
Why wait for spring to clean house?
 
Annotate.net
Where You Go Information Follows.
 
BUYandHOLD
Invest for only $2.99 per order.
 
   

 
Search
the site  the Web

Powered by Lycos

 
Inside Tech
 Talk Tech
 FAQ/Tips
 Web Column
 Hot Sites
 Tech News
 Tech Investor
 Tech Reviews
 Answer Desk
 Game Zone
 Daily Digest
 Shareware Shelf
 Web Potholes
 Web Resources
 Consumer Sites
 Tech Front

Marketplace
 Hardware
 Accessories
 Software

Print Edition
  Today
  Yesterday
  Subscribe
  Archive
  Redesign
B&N

Resources
  E-mail
  Site map
  Feedback
  About us
  Jobs at USA TODAY

Free premiums
  USA TODAY Update
  Software

 



 
 
 

02/21/00- Updated 05:24 PM ET

 

Ex-White House lawyers join MS cause





Microsoft's insurer sues over legal bill coverage




DOJ's Klein speaks out on MS case




Ballmer: Microsoft didn't break law




Antitrust chief defends Microsoft case




Bush adviser's firm halts MS lobbying




Judge: Microsoft violated antitrust law




Photo gallery




Index of coverage









Do you agree with the Microsoft ruling?

WASHINGTON (AP) - Microsoft Corp. is adding to its roster of powerful allies in its antitrust trial, with former White House counsels and two former U.S. attorneys general set to argue that the software giant didn't violate any federal laws.

These lawyers aligning themselves with Microsoft in a legal filing this week also include the general counsel for AT&T Corp. when it agreed in the 1980s to a breakup as part of another Justice Department lawsuit.

An industry trade group, the Washington-based Association for Competitive Technology, confirmed it has been invited to file a ''friend of the court'' brief on behalf of Microsoft.

The association will argue that federal antitrust laws should protect consumers -- not Microsoft's rivals -- and that the company's aggressive behavior, ''far from being illegal is essential to the continued health and growth'' of the industry, said Jonathan Zuck, the group's president.

''There is really no bright line between tough and vigorous and fair competition in the interest of consumers and tough but unfair competition,'' Lloyd Cutler, a former counsel to Presidents Clinton and Carter who was hired by the industry group, told The Associated Press. ''Microsoft's actions fell on the lawful rather than the unlawful side of the line.''

A Justice Department official declined to comment on the trade association's arguments.

The government did not identify whom it invited to write its brief. Experts have speculated on former federal judge Robert Bork, University of Iowa professor Herbert Hovenkamp or Washington antitrust lawyer Richard G. Taranto.

Along with Cutler, others supporting Microsoft now include Boyden Gray, counsel to President Bush until 1993; Griffin Bell, attorney general under Carter and a former federal appeals court judge; Howard Trienens, the former AT&T lawyer; and Nicholas Katzenbach, attorney general under President Johnson.

In an unusual twist, Katzenbach had worked side-by-side with lawyer David Boies for IBM on a similar antitrust lawsuit by the government during the 1970s. Boies now is the lead trial attorney for Justice against Microsoft.

''It's a mix of Democrats and Republicans, a politically diverse group,'' said William Kovacic, an antitrust expert at George Washington University. ''Part of the message it sends is, even Democrats don't have to like this case, that there are lots of thoughtful people who don't find this case attractive.''

The latest round of legal filings, expected Tuesday, will argue about which antitrust laws Microsoft violated, if any, during the Internet software ''browser wars'' of the last decade.

The trial judge has already found that Microsoft, whose Windows software runs most of the world's personal computers, abused its monopoly power during its battle with the former Netscape Communications Corp.

''It's going to be very difficult to convince this judge, based on what he's already said, that Microsoft didn't violate the law,'' said Marc Schildkraut, who investigated the company in the 1990s while at the Federal Trade Commission.

Courtroom arguments are set for Feb. 22, though secret settlement talks continue in Chicago. At a high-tech conference in Europe, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates declined to comment on the antitrust case but said, ''There's a good mediation process going on.''

Any decision about Microsoft's future -- such as prospects for a court-ordered breakup -- aren't expected in Washington at least until summer. But Trienens' role draws renewed attention to those questions, since he opposed AT&T's breakup through its trial but finally agreed to it in a consent decree. Microsoft also has said it strongly opposes any breakup.

U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, the trial judge, asked Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig to file a third brief this week on behalf of the court.

Microsoft had successfully challenged the judge's appointment of Lessig in December 1997 as a ''special master'' to look into important technical issues in a related case. The company accused him of bias and cited an old e-mail message in which Lessig told Netscape he had ''sold my soul'' by installing Microsoft's Web browser software.

Zuck, who has been an ardent defender of Microsoft throughout the trial, said the company agreed to allow his organization to file its brief about a month ago.

Although Microsoft is the largest member of the trade association, Zuck said he raised the money for lawyers -- estimated to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars -- from private contributions from other high-tech companies. He declined to specify how much was spent.


Copyright 2000 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.




Front page, News, Sports, Money, Life, Weather, Marketplace  
© Copyright 2000 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.