Comments on Docker Hub – why is there no `lts` tag? #104

Open
Starefossen opened this Issue Feb 17, 2016 · 5 comments

Projects

None yet

5 participants

@Starefossen
Member

I have had many questions as of late why we do not provide an lts tag. This was thoroughly discussed in #52 but I think it would beneficial to add something about lts / argon to the README of this repo and on Docker Hub.

Speaking of Docker Hub, there is a lot of unattended comments for the node image. I have opened docker/hub-feedback#579 in an attempt to have the Docker Hub gals and guys to provide a better way to comment on official images, or at least get a notification about new comments.

@chorrell
Contributor

Yep, totally agree. I've seen a few questions about an "lts" tag myself.

And thanks for opening docker/hub-feedback#579!

There doesn't seem to be an easy way to monitor comments there. It's something I've struggled with for a while. I'm not even sure if OPs get a notification if we respond to a given question and there's no way to "reply" to a specific comment. Honestly, as it is now I'd prefer if the comments were just disabled and people were directed to submit an issue here.

@Starefossen Starefossen changed the title from Explain why there is no `lts` tag to Comments on Docker Hub – why is there no `lts` tag? Mar 4, 2016
@Starefossen
Member

Maybe @tianon or @yosifkit could speak our case with the Docker Hub maintainers on docker/hub-feedback#579.

@2color
2color commented Mar 9, 2016

👍

@riggerthegeek

👍

To my mind, an LTS tag also makes sense. The only downside could be is that it could cause breaking changes on switchover day between the versions. However, that's something for the project maintainers to worry about, rather than the Docker maintainers.

@atd-schubert

👍

@chorrell chorrell added the docs label Mar 30, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment