★ wanayoo — archive 1999 http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/xml-dev-Jan-2000/author.html

xml-dev-Jan-2000
By Author

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
Other mail archives

Starting: Thu 01 Jan 1970 - 00:07:59 GMT
Ending: Sat 31 Jan 1970 - 23:23:26 GMT
Messages: 1168

Á¤ÀçÀ
- (no subject) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:59:40 +0900
Abhishek Srivastava
- Deleting a DOM Node Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:23:30 +0530
- Type "Any" Sat, 15 Jan 2000 19:58:01 +0530
- Re: Element_node.getValue() Thu, 30 Dec 1999 22:37:35 +0530
Alan Santos
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 5 Jan 2000 22:59:56 -0500
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 5 Jan 2000 18:55:29 -0500
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 5 Jan 2000 18:15:41 -0500
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 5 Jan 2000 16:57:16 -0500
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:20:34 -0500
- Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:26:26 -0500
- Re: To Oracle or NOT to Oracle Wed, 5 Jan 2000 11:11:44 -0500
Aleksi Niemelä
- RE: Problem with substituting XSL @ variable into a hyper link Fri, 21 Jan 2000 20:05:33 +0100
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:05:56 +0100
- RE: Is <any> really enough for <any><body>? Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:10:31 +0100
- Is <any> really enough for <any><body>? Tue, 11 Jan 2000 16:57:01 +0100
Amit Rekhi
- Problem in understanding rule [14] of XML spec Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:54:36 +0530
Anders W. Tell
- Re: Hierarchical namespaces? Wed, 29 Dec 1999 19:20:02 +0100
Andrea Biasuzzi
- unsubscribe xml-dev abiasuzzi@objectdesign.it Mon, 31 Jan 2000 14:05:39 +0100
Andrew Layman
- RE: XML: A outside perspective Fri, 28 Jan 2000 09:52:56 -0800
- RE: Undeclared namespace Thu, 27 Jan 2000 13:15:55 -0800
- RE: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:48:29 -0800
- RE: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Sat, 15 Jan 2000 14:53:42 -0800
- RE: Great controversies of XML Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:09:34 -0800
- RE: locally scoped element decls and namespaces Tue, 4 Jan 2000 10:20:36 -0800
- RE: locally scoped element decls and namespaces Mon, 3 Jan 2000 14:48:08 -0800
- RE: locally scoped element decls and namespaces Mon, 3 Jan 2000 12:03:17 -0800
- RE: Namespaces and Validating XML Parsers Question Mon, 3 Jan 2000 11:19:46 -0800
- RE: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML S chema Questions Thu, 30 Dec 1999 14:12:41 -0800
- RE: (Many) XML Schema Questions Wed, 29 Dec 1999 12:10:32 -0800
- RE: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML S chema Questions Thu, 30 Dec 1999 14:05:16 -0800
- RE: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions Thu, 30 Dec 1999 10:24:51 -0800
Andy Dent
- RE: expat tree-builder (dom) Sat, 29 Jan 2000 13:08:29 +0800
- Re: expat tree-builder (dom) Fri, 28 Jan 2000 23:35:38 +0800
Andy.Bradbury@syntegra.bt.co.uk
- RE: Geoworks and their patent Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:08:16 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Tue, 25 Jan 2000 11:28:36 -0000
Angel Torrecillas
- unsubscribe Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:11:59 +0100
- (no subject) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:12:09 +0100
- unsubscribe Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:27:38 +0100
- (no subject) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:27:17 +0100
Ann Navarro
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Sat, 22 Jan 2000 14:15:00 -0500
- Re: R: interesting data point on preferred computers/browser types Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:32:08 -0500
- Re: interesting data point on preferred computers/browser types Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:50:20 -0500
- interesting data point on preferred computers/browser types Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:28:20 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:12:53 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:00:17 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:23:35 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:23:46 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:18:55 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:54:45 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:51:20 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:53:28 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:50:44 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 19:02:05 -0500
- Re: Costs of the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:25:37 -0500
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:09:28 -0500
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:54:06 -0500
- Re: Costs of the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:52:42 -0500
- Re: Costs of the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:45:32 -0500
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:20:59 -0500
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:33:27 -0500
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:48:57 -0500
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:35:44 -0500
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:45:51 -0500
Anuja Gokhale
- indexing xml documents.. Tue, 4 Jan 2000 10:25:00 -0500
Arjun Ray
- Re: Attribute normalisation and character entities Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:28:05 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Attribute normalisation and character entities Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:55:30 -0500 (EST)
Arnold, Curt
- RE: Any public source code for an XML Schema (12/17/99) checker o ut t here? Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:53:01 -0700
- RE: Is <any> really enough for <any><body>? Tue, 11 Jan 2000 10:09:06 -0700
- ANN: Help file for 17 Dec XML Schema Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:23:16 -0700
- Simplification of equivClass functionality Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:23:37 -0700
- RE: Requirement for attributes with schema scope Fri, 7 Jan 2000 12:33:04 -0700
- RE: Requirement for attributes with schema scope Fri, 7 Jan 2000 08:12:02 -0700
- Requirement for attributes with schema scope Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:59:20 -0700
- PROPOSAL: type assignment based on tag name and presence/absense of attributes Thu, 6 Jan 2000 09:46:39 -0700
- RE: XML Schema Datatype Questions Thu, 6 Jan 2000 08:52:59 -0700
Ashish Agarwal,AMB Chennai
- Problems with the mailing list Tue, 4 Jan 2000 16:49:00 +0530
- xml with xsl Mon, 3 Jan 2000 16:27:20 +0530
- Problems with XML Fri, 31 Dec 1999 10:32:29 +0530
- Problems with XML Fri, 31 Dec 1999 10:37:18 +0530
ashutosh dandavate
- unsubscribe Mon, 31 Jan 2000 06:35:06 PST
Aurenz, Scot
- RE: Expat & internal entities Fri, 28 Jan 2000 13:52:49 -0500
av srinivas
- unsubscribe Fri, 21 Jan 2000 23:48:51 -0800 (PST)
- unsubscribe Fri, 21 Jan 2000 23:43:46 -0800 (PST)
- unsuscribe Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Barnowsky, Greg T.
- RE: Querying the DOM using XPath Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:53:38 -0500
- Querying the DOM using XPath Tue, 25 Jan 2000 12:56:22 -0500
Betty L. Harvey
- RE: EDITORIAL Tue, 25 Jan 2000 18:15:22 -1000 (HST)
- Re: XML for 3D geometry and objects Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:12:17 -1000 (HST)
Bill dehOra
- RE: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 2000 18:31:12 -0000
- RE: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 2000 11:29:57 -0000
- RE: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 2000 09:10:34 -0000
- RE: Geoworks and their patent Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:06:43 -0000
- RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:39:16 -0000
- RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:07:56 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:00:13 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:46:18 -0000
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:07:32 -0000
Bill la Forge
- Appologies, Re: An Open, industry-neutral schema for transaction processing Thu, 27 Jan 2000 02:55:40 -0500
- An Open, industry-neutral schema for transaction processing Thu, 27 Jan 2000 02:08:26 -0500
- An Open, industry-neutral schema for transaction processing Thu, 27 Jan 2000 02:08:20 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Mon, 17 Jan 2000 18:21:07 -0500
Bob Kline
- Re: query language Mon, 31 Jan 2000 18:20:18 -0500 (EST)
- Re: query language Mon, 31 Jan 2000 18:09:27 -0500 (EST)
- Referencing the results of prior queries with XQL Wed, 26 Jan 2000 12:22:13 -0500 (EST)
- RE: Querying the DOM using XPath Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:57:59 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:07:42 -0500 (EST)
- Re: External Entites Usage Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:12:06 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:45:18 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Thu, 6 Jan 2000 23:43:43 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Thu, 6 Jan 2000 15:47:40 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:51:25 -0500 (EST)
- Namespace prefixes optional? Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:07:16 -0500 (EST)
- Re: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions Thu, 30 Dec 1999 08:02:36 -0500 (EST)
- Re: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions Thu, 30 Dec 1999 09:20:18 -0500 (EST)
- RE: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions Thu, 30 Dec 1999 17:32:45 -0500 (EST)
Box, Don
- RE: Data exchange BOF at Netscape Sat, 29 Jan 2000 21:32:11 -0800
- ANN: MSXML 2.6 shipped today Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:45:25 -0800
- RE: (Many) XML Schema Questions Mon, 27 Dec 1999 20:51:51 -0800
Brandt Dainow
- RE: Problem with substituting XSL @ variable into a hyper link Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:13:48 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:33:42 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:32:31 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:14:55 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:40:25 -0000
- RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:16:51 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:27:50 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:19:30 -0000
- RE: Generating Drop Down HTML tags with XSL Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:11:01 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:45:27 -0000
- RE: Redecleration of Element Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:05:15 -0000
- RE: XML vs. CORBA (was RE: Alternatives to browsers) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 20:17:43 -0000
- RE: XML & Databases Tue, 18 Jan 2000 16:36:47 -0000
Brett McLaughlin
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:35:07 -0600
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:24:05 -0600
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:22:42 -0600
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 05 Jan 2000 15:59:02 -0600
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 05 Jan 2000 15:30:16 -0600
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 05 Jan 2000 15:13:37 -0600
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions Wed, 05 Jan 2000 13:38:14 -0600
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 05 Jan 2000 12:40:42 -0600
- Re: To Oracle or NOT to Oracle Wed, 05 Jan 2000 08:28:00 -0600
- XML Schema Question Sat, 01 Jan 2000 21:10:35 -0600
Brown, Sam
- RE: A outside perspective Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:14:08 -0800
- XML digital signatures Sun, 2 Jan 2000 21:47:04 -0800
Bruce D. Nilo
- Namespaces and Validating XML Parsers Question Thu, 30 Dec 1999 19:00:27 -0800
Charles Wiltgen
- Introduction Sun, 30 Jan 2000 14:25:06 -0800
Charlie Kaiman
- RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:01:11 -0500
Chen Hong Qiang
- Is there any good browser in Unix? Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:41:15 +0800
Christian Hammond
- Expat & internal entities Fri, 28 Jan 2000 02:04:41 -0800
- xml:lang: Am I doing more work than I need to be? Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:11:37 -0800
Christopher R. Maden
- Re: xml:lang: Am I doing more work than I need to be? Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:30:51 -0800
Clark C. Evans
- Re: SAX2: pull interface Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:41:29 -0500 (EST)
- Character Tugging (Was:Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:24:26 -0500 (EST)
- SaxStreamValidator? (Was: String interning) Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:51:30 -0500 (EST)
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Sat, 15 Jan 2000 20:20:57 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Great controversies of XML Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:33:51 -0500 (EST)
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:01:20 -0500 (EST)
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:50:28 -0500 (EST)
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:26:39 -0500 (EST)
- Thanks! (Was: Mixed-content use-cases and questions) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:46:22 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Mixed-content use-cases and questions Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:00:47 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Mixed-content use-cases and questions Tue, 11 Jan 2000 22:12:05 -0500 (EST)
- Mixed-content use-cases and questions Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:32:47 -0500 (EST)
- "plain" element for HTML/XHTML Wed, 5 Jan 2000 18:13:48 -0500 (EST)
- John's Suggestion (Was: Re: SAX2 Namespace Support) Wed, 5 Jan 2000 16:24:27 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException? Mon, 3 Jan 2000 15:07:34 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException? Mon, 3 Jan 2000 13:03:38 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException? Mon, 3 Jan 2000 09:52:43 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Hierarchical namespaces? Wed, 29 Dec 1999 22:49:33 -0500 (EST)
Colin Muller
- Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Fri, 21 Jan 2000 18:44:44 +0200
Corbett.Klempay@trilogy.com
- document generation Mon, 10 Jan 2000 12:02:14 -0600
Cox Andy
- RE: relation between CSS & XSL Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:28:47 -0500
- RE: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 5 Jan 2000 11:36:32 -0500
Cristiane Santana C Santos
- unsubscribe xml-dev Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:42:09 -0300
- unsubscribe Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:22:28 -0300
Dan Vint
- Re: Namespaces and XSLT simplified syntax Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:26:09 -0500
- Namespaces and XSLT simplified syntax Sun, 09 Jan 2000 16:13:21 -0500
Daniel Potter
- Re: XML Schema Datatype Questions Thu, 06 Jan 2000 10:12:24 -0500
- ANN: XML Schema Regular Expression Parser Tue, 04 Jan 2000 14:17:23 -0500
- XML Schemas and the Enumeration Facet Mon, 03 Jan 2000 16:51:14 -0500
- XML Schema Datatype Questions Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:12:39 -0500
Daniel Veillard
- Re: My browser is longer than your browser Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:24:12 -0500
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 07:00:09 -0500
Dave Winer
- Re: Geoworks and their patent Sun, 23 Jan 2000 08:58:52 -0800
- Geoworks and their patent Sun, 23 Jan 2000 08:06:14 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:14:59 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 08:53:01 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 07:35:16 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 05:08:57 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 19:16:53 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:30:42 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 15:53:47 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:38:21 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:56:38 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:30:06 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:23:11 -0800
- XML-RPC interface for Manila Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:09:33 -0800
- Re: XML vs. CORBA (was RE: Alternatives to browsers) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:36:20 -0800
David Brownell
- Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals. Mon, 31 Jan 2000 10:19:48 -0800
- Re: ANN: SAX2-beta (2000-01-28) Sun, 30 Jan 2000 16:44:14 -0800
- Re: Attribute normalisation and character entities Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:56:44 -0800
- What's this XML stuff anyway? (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:33:08 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:06:43 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:29:19 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:29:39 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:59:35 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:54:01 -0800
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Tue, 18 Jan 2000 01:38:16 -0800
- Re: Costs of the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:06:14 -0800
- Re: Costs of the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:59:52 -0800
- Re: Simple XML conformance Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:45:07 -0800
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:41:11 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:23:33 -0800
- Re: W3C policy [Was: Microsoft's responce ...] Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:54:04 -0800
- W3C policies [was: Re: Microsoft's responce ... ] Mon, 17 Jan 2000 01:36:32 -0800
- Re: Simple XML conformance Sun, 16 Jan 2000 21:59:09 -0800
- Re: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Sun, 16 Jan 2000 10:30:02 -0800
- Re: SAX2: org.xml.sax.helpers.SAXUtils Sat, 15 Jan 2000 19:46:08 -0800
- Re: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Sat, 15 Jan 2000 19:39:49 -0800
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Sat, 15 Jan 2000 19:06:19 -0800
- Re: Great controversies of XML Sat, 15 Jan 2000 10:47:01 -0800
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Sat, 15 Jan 2000 10:22:09 -0800
- Re: String interning Fri, 14 Jan 2000 14:26:18 -0800
- Re: file extension naming conventions Fri, 14 Jan 2000 14:18:51 -0800
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:34:53 -0800
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:19:52 -0800
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:13:35 -0800
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:09:54 -0800
- Re: Great controversies of XML Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:58:03 -0800
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Fri, 14 Jan 2000 10:34:17 -0800
- Re: Microsoft's response to XML.com article Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:27:08 -0800
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:19:27 -0800
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:41:21 -0800
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:35:51 -0800
- Re: External Entites Usage Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:42:07 -0800
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:39:04 -0800
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Tue, 11 Jan 2000 13:15:52 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Which license? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 20:31:55 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Which license? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 13:20:29 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Which license? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:29:30 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Thu, 06 Jan 2000 12:30:55 -0800
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Thu, 06 Jan 2000 12:25:38 -0800
- Re: Wish lists for the Holidays Wed, 05 Jan 2000 20:47:17 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Wed, 05 Jan 2000 12:01:54 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Wed, 05 Jan 2000 11:53:57 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Wed, 05 Jan 2000 11:45:13 -0800
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 05 Jan 2000 11:14:23 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:32:01 -0800
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:23:29 -0800
- Re: Unicode confusion Tue, 04 Jan 2000 08:56:35 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException? Mon, 03 Jan 2000 11:00:43 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException? Mon, 03 Jan 2000 09:20:57 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException? Sun, 02 Jan 2000 15:39:03 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException? Sun, 02 Jan 2000 14:33:17 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Sun, 02 Jan 2000 11:02:42 -0800
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Sun, 02 Jan 2000 10:48:35 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Features and Properties Sun, 02 Jan 2000 09:15:57 -0800
- SAX/C++: GCJ and CNI Tue, 28 Dec 1999 14:16:43 -0800
- Re: Wish lists for the Holidays Tue, 28 Dec 1999 13:40:56 -0800
- Re: SAX/C++: GCJ and CNI Wed, 29 Dec 1999 12:00:36 -0800
David Carlisle
- Re: Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:42:56 GMT
- Re: Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema Wed, 5 Jan 2000 13:37:37 GMT
David DS Barnes
- Re: Extensible browsers Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:48:18 +0100
- Re: [Xml] Inventory Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:40:21 +0100
David Megginson
- Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals. 31 Jan 2000 18:04:46 -0500
- ANN: XTech 2000 in San Jose Mon, 31 Jan 2000 10:10:17 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2-beta (2000-01-28) Sun, 30 Jan 2000 08:44:07 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2-beta (2000-01-28) 28 Jan 2000 15:05:59 -0500
- ANN: SAX2-beta (2000-01-28) Fri, 28 Jan 2000 13:13:50 -0500 (EST)
- Re: XML: A outside perspective Fri, 28 Jan 2000 06:20:15 -0500 (EST)
- RE: A outside perspective Thu, 27 Jan 2000 20:33:12 -0500 (EST)
- XML: A outside perspective Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:59:54 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX newbie Q : absolute DTD path in system id 26 Jan 2000 11:49:17 -0500
- Re: XMLNews newbie... 25 Jan 2000 22:11:43 -0500
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent 25 Jan 2000 09:24:33 -0500
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent 24 Jan 2000 15:34:31 -0500
- Re: Geoworks and their patent 23 Jan 2000 20:29:48 -0500
- Re: Geoworks and their patent 23 Jan 2000 20:28:20 -0500
- My browser is longer than your browser Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:27:00 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2: pull interface 20 Jan 2000 08:57:25 -0500
- Re: tricky XHTML 1.0 namespace question 17 Jan 2000 21:16:36 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) 17 Jan 2000 21:17:53 -0500
- CORBA/RMI vs XML/RDF/XMI 18 Jan 2000 15:10:47 -0500
- Re: SAX2: pull interface 18 Jan 2000 15:04:45 -0500
- RE: SAX2: DOM support Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:56:41 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) 18 Jan 2000 09:44:32 -0500
- SAX2: pull interface Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:34:39 -0500 (EST)
- SAX2: DOM support Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:26:45 -0500 (EST)
- SAX2 and data types (was: Character Tugging) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:19:19 -0500 (EST)
- SaxStreamValidator? (Was: String interning) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:12:43 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article 17 Jan 2000 15:43:17 -0500
- Re: Costs of the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:01:47 -0500 (EST)
- Re: tricky XHTML 1.0 namespace question 17 Jan 2000 14:03:44 -0500
- Costs of the W3C 17 Jan 2000 14:01:11 -0500
- Re: SAX2: org.xml.sax.helpers.SAXUtils Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:10:27 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C 17 Jan 2000 11:02:57 -0500
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article 16 Jan 2000 19:29:34 -0500
- Re: SAX2: org.xml.sax.helpers.SAXUtils Sun, 16 Jan 2000 19:06:53 -0500 (EST)
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) 15 Jan 2000 15:18:09 -0500
- Re: file extension naming conventions 14 Jan 2000 17:11:28 -0500
- RE: String interning Fri, 14 Jan 2000 17:07:17 -0500 (EST)
- Re: String interning Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:48:20 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Sting interning: test cases wanted. 14 Jan 2000 15:50:22 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) 14 Jan 2000 15:38:20 -0500
- Re: String interning Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:35:00 -0500 (EST)
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) 14 Jan 2000 13:32:50 -0500
- Re: Great controversies of XML 14 Jan 2000 12:59:22 -0500
- SAX2: org.xml.sax.helpers.SAXUtils Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:33:35 -0500 (EST)
- RE: Naming the SAX2 thingy Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:45:50 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Great controversies of XML 13 Jan 2000 19:04:47 -0500
- Naming the SAX2 thingy 13 Jan 2000 18:56:12 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) 13 Jan 2000 18:54:21 -0500
- XMLReader extends Parser??? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:52:04 -0500 (EST)
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) 12 Jan 2000 14:08:04 -0500
- RE: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:07:30 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2: Which license? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 14:08:04 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Mon, 10 Jan 2000 13:59:48 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Mon, 10 Jan 2000 11:35:49 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Mon, 10 Jan 2000 11:18:59 -0500 (EST)
- SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:10:19 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2: Which license? 10 Jan 2000 08:22:09 -0500
- SAX2: Which license? Sat, 8 Jan 2000 13:49:37 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Well-formed and valid 08 Jan 2000 09:37:23 -0500
- Well-formed and valid 07 Jan 2000 21:53:49 -0500
- XML Europe and XTech deadlines Fri, 7 Jan 2000 13:56:44 -0500 (EST)
- RE: SAX2: Parser interface Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:47:04 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2 NS processing (was Re: Namespace question) 07 Jan 2000 09:00:41 -0500
- Re: Namespace prefixes optional? 07 Jan 2000 08:55:58 -0500
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Fri, 7 Jan 2000 08:25:30 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Namespace prefixes optional? 06 Jan 2000 19:21:58 -0500
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? 06 Jan 2000 19:12:54 -0500
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? 06 Jan 2000 19:06:18 -0500
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? 06 Jan 2000 14:11:16 -0500
- RE: SAX2 Namespace Support Thu, 6 Jan 2000 13:56:32 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support 05 Jan 2000 18:57:42 -0500
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support 05 Jan 2000 10:12:59 -0500
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support 04 Jan 2000 16:28:04 -0500
- Re: sax2: cdata, characters and ignorable whitespace 04 Jan 2000 09:07:24 -0500
- Unicode confusion 04 Jan 2000 09:02:28 -0500
- RE: SAX2: Parser interface Tue, 4 Jan 2000 08:57:27 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support 03 Jan 2000 09:23:21 -0500
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:33:52 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Tue, 28 Dec 1999 09:47:15 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException? Tue, 28 Dec 1999 09:50:44 -0500 (EST)
David Turner
- RE: Does anyone know of such a tool.... Sun, 16 Jan 2000 13:33:09 -0800
Dennis Thrysoe - GeoGrafik A/S
- Redecleration of Element Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:20:49 +0100
Didier PH Martin
- New version of the Table of contents document Mon, 24 Jan 2000 21:54:30 -0500
- RE: EDITORIAL Mon, 24 Jan 2000 17:55:29 -0500
- RE: EDITORIAL Mon, 24 Jan 2000 17:45:11 -0500
- About xlink tools Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:49:20 -0500
- RE: Further work on Xlink Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:57:04 -0500
- RE: Further work on Xlink Mon, 24 Jan 2000 08:42:52 -0500
- Semantic links Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:43:12 -0500
- Further work on Xlink Mon, 24 Jan 2000 06:40:45 -0500
- Politics? baaah no, Feedback on peer's work? yeah! Mon, 24 Jan 2000 06:12:54 -0500
- Portal experiment Sun, 23 Jan 2000 16:08:06 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Sun, 23 Jan 2000 09:51:02 -0500
- RE: Geoworks and their patent Sun, 23 Jan 2000 00:00:54 -0500
- RE: Geoworks and their patent Sat, 22 Jan 2000 21:18:15 -0500
- RE: Sorry, off topic Sat, 22 Jan 2000 20:46:21 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Sat, 22 Jan 2000 20:26:56 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Sat, 22 Jan 2000 20:06:40 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:20:35 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:11:04 -0500
- Browsers evolution Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:29:11 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:18:05 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:33:12 -0500
- RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects Fri, 21 Jan 2000 05:32:53 -0500
- RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects Thu, 20 Jan 2000 23:15:34 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 03:52:10 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 01:21:44 -0500
- RE: Extensible browsers Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:18:15 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:09:26 -0500
- RE: Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 23:48:26 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 23:20:25 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 23:15:00 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:57:07 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:52:39 -0500
- RE: Generating Drop Down HTML tags with XSL Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:52:26 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:03:48 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:32:39 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 20:22:24 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 03:17:35 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:19:09 -0500
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 01:41:57 -0500
- RE: The DOM: the realist and the implementer Mon, 17 Jan 2000 01:31:22 -0500
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:00:32 -0500
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Sun, 16 Jan 2000 23:31:32 -0500
- RE: The DOM: the realist and the implementer Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:46:40 -0500
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:15:42 -0500
- RE: An XML catalog is a good idea ... Sun, 16 Jan 2000 05:17:12 -0500
- RE: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Sun, 16 Jan 2000 03:08:06 -0500
- RE: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Sun, 16 Jan 2000 02:39:21 -0500
- RE: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Sat, 15 Jan 2000 23:12:52 -0500
- RE: The DOM: the realist and the implementer Sat, 15 Jan 2000 22:53:24 -0500
- RE: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Sat, 15 Jan 2000 22:02:00 -0500
- The DOM: the realist and the implementer Sat, 15 Jan 2000 05:15:03 -0500
- The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Sat, 15 Jan 2000 04:19:35 -0500
- About the XPath experiment Tue, 11 Jan 2000 10:24:11 -0500
- RE: Sterday morning mind games or News from Didier's lab Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:31:04 -0500
- Sterday morning mind games or News from Didier's lab Sat, 8 Jan 2000 14:26:24 -0500
Don Park
- RE: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?) Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:20:02 -0800
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:26:25 -0800
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:07:31 -0800
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:15:55 -0800
- RE: SML Status Report Mon, 10 Jan 2000 09:14:07 -0800
- RE: SML Status Report Sun, 9 Jan 2000 00:31:12 -0800
- SML Status Report Sat, 8 Jan 2000 12:47:11 -0800
- RE: hierarchical database for repository Sat, 8 Jan 2000 08:25:07 -0800
- RE: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 5 Jan 2000 09:07:53 -0800
Dongwook Shin
- Re: Java XML-Parser Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:41:36 -0500
- Re: indexing xml documents.. Tue, 04 Jan 2000 13:28:44 -0500
Doug Forman
- expat tree-builder (dom) Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:00:42 -0800
- Beginner question - What is a schema? Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:51:48 -0800
- XML to represent Musical Notation Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:45:58 -0800
DuCharme, Robert
- RE: Getting "<" and "&" sign in the HTML document Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:04:25 -0500
- RE: my XSLT equipment Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:55:03 -0500
- RE: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding imp enetrable language; reconsider?) Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:57:09 -0500
- RE: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsi der? Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:33:20 -0500
- RE: XML Converter Wed, 29 Dec 1999 10:40:01 -0500
- IE+XML+XSL and html namespace Wed, 29 Dec 1999 13:35:30 -0500
DUDOUET Eric
- Stop the unsubscribe message !! Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:41:47 +0100
Ed Nixon
- RE: hierarchical database for repository Fri, 7 Jan 2000 19:04:45 -0500
Edd Dumbill
- Re: Simple XML conformance Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:15:01 +0000
- Re: XML Europe and XTech deadlines Fri, 7 Jan 2000 20:19:03 +0000
Edward C. Zimmermann
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 100 20:48:39 +0100 (MET)
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 100 13:50:48 +0100 (MET)
elee@us.ibm.com
- unsubscribe Mon, 31 Jan 2000 10:12:21 -0500
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Revised XLinks and XPointers chapters Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:35:31 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:43:59 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:54:28 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:16:05 -0500
Eric Bohlman
- Re: Beginner question - What is a schema? Tue, 25 Jan 2000 05:44:00 -0800 (PST)
- RE: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 2000 03:23:11 -0800 (PST)
- Re: MODERATION, etc. Sat, 22 Jan 2000 13:03:02 -0800 (PST)
- Re: R: interesting data point on preferred computers/browser types Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:44:50 -0800 (PST)
- Re: SAX2: pull interface Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:49:16 -0800 (PST)
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:23:02 -0800 (PST)
Eric Ulevik
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:11:20 +1100
Eric van der Vlist
- Re: query language Mon, 31 Jan 2000 23:25:59 +0100
- XMLNews newbie... Tue, 25 Jan 2000 23:58:36 +0100
- RFC : XML representation of a HTTP request Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:31:26 +0100
- announce: XML Tips Sat, 15 Jan 2000 15:51:23 +0100
- ANNOUNCE : quick hack to bind XML to objects Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:10:13 +0100
- Re: hierarchical database for repository Sat, 08 Jan 2000 07:54:54 +0100
evermanm@tsainc.com
- Definition of code contents Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:14:18 -0600
Fabio Arciniegas A.
- ms news Mon, 24 Jan 2000 21:07:49 -0500
- Re: Derivation by Restriction Sun, 23 Jan 2000 10:09:08 -0500
- Re: Derivation by Restriction Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:32:59 -0500
- Re: XML to represent Musical Notation Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:13:53 -0500
- Derivation by Restriction Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:12:05 -0500
- Re: unicode confusion Tue, 4 Jan 2000 13:37:45 -0500 (GMT+5)
- RE: Survey Catalysis Wed, 29 Dec 1999 13:46:46 -0500 (GMT+5)
Falk, Alexander
- ANNOUNCE: XML Spy 3.0b2 public beta release available for downloa d Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:10:21 +0100
- RE: [techspace] Re: Questions related to XML Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:20:01 +0100
flood
- xml and asp HELP! Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:00:40 +0200
- convert XML to MsAccess Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:32:30 +0200
FormatData
- ANN: DESSERT - A DTD for Recipes Sun, 2 Jan 2000 01:17:18 -0500
Francis Norton
- Re: Querying the DOM using XPath Wed, 26 Jan 2000 15:12:38 +0000
- Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:45:55 +0000
- Re: Wish lists for the Holidays Thu, 06 Jan 2000 00:22:52 +0000
- Re: Wish lists for the Holidays Wed, 29 Dec 1999 01:06:50 +0000
Franck PUEL
- unsubscribe Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:24:03 +0100
Frank Boumphrey
- Robert Burns works available as XML(2) Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:05:51 -0500
- Robert Burns works available as XML Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:16:25 -0500
- ?Simple XML parser for Mac's Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:08:25 -0500
- Re: Simple XML conformance Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:01:28 -0500
- Re: XML & Databases Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:59:52 -0500
- Re: SML Status Report Sat, 8 Jan 2000 23:22:54 -0500
- Re: Well-formed and valid Sat, 8 Jan 2000 23:19:00 -0500
- Re: Well-formed and valid Sat, 8 Jan 2000 00:13:50 -0500
- Re: Hierarchical namespaces? Wed, 29 Dec 1999 21:36:45 -0500
Frank Richards
- Re: hierarchical database for repository Sat, 08 Jan 2000 12:29:46 -0500
Franklin Cheng
- unsubscribe Wed, 5 Jan 2000 13:54:48 -0600
- unsubscribe Tue, 4 Jan 2000 22:57:36 -0600
Gabe Beged-Dov
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 08:46:48 -0800
- locally scoped element decls and namespaces Mon, 03 Jan 2000 10:10:50 -0800
Gilmore
- unsubscribe xml-dev gilmore@xs4all.nl Mon, 31 Jan 2000 18:09:37 +0100
Greg Messner
- RE: XML -> Java code generator. Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:01:26 -0800
Gregory M. Messner
- Data exchange BOF at Netscape Thu, 27 Jan 2000 07:41:22 -0800
Gulf & East TRDG.
- (no subject) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:08:16 +0400
Helder Caeiro
- (no subject) 27 Jan 00 04:19:29 MST
Hemissi Maher
- unsubscribe Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:39:11 +0100
Henry S. Thompson
- Re: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset 29 Jan 2000 13:12:00 +0000
- Re: Derivation by Restriction 24 Jan 2000 09:19:50 +0000
- Re: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?) 24 Jan 2000 09:09:13 +0000
- Re: Derivation by Restriction 24 Jan 2000 09:04:41 +0000
- Re: tricky XHTML 1.0 namespace question 17 Jan 2000 22:07:43 +0000
- Re: tricky XHTML 1.0 namespace question 17 Jan 2000 21:39:28 +0000
- Re: tricky XHTML 1.0 namespace question 17 Jan 2000 18:18:01 +0000
- Re: Any public source code for an XML Schema (12/17/99) checker out t here? 14 Jan 2000 20:48:38 +0000
- Re: ANN: Help file for 17 Dec XML Schema 11 Jan 2000 16:35:33 +0000
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form 10 Jan 2000 16:47:12 +0000
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form 10 Jan 2000 15:53:36 +0000
- Re: Requirement for attributes with schema scope 07 Jan 2000 19:16:34 +0000
- Re: Requirement for attributes with schema scope 07 Jan 2000 10:47:14 +0000
- Re: ANN: XML Schema Tutorial 06 Jan 2000 15:53:10 +0000
- Re: Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema 06 Jan 2000 13:49:02 +0000
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions 05 Jan 2000 23:55:47 +0000
- Re: Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema 05 Jan 2000 23:50:46 +0000
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions 05 Jan 2000 23:41:00 +0000
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions 05 Jan 2000 23:36:54 +0000
- Re: Basic XMLSchema questions 05 Jan 2000 23:30:39 +0000
- Re: Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema 05 Jan 2000 23:18:56 +0000
- Re: Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema 05 Jan 2000 14:25:09 +0000
- Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces 04 Jan 2000 20:57:32 +0000
- Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces 04 Jan 2000 17:44:24 +0000
- Re: Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema 04 Jan 2000 16:14:07 +0000
- Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces 04 Jan 2000 12:50:09 +0000
- Re: Specifying scope of uniqueness in XML Schemas? 03 Jan 2000 17:29:52 +0000
- Re: XML Schema Question 02 Jan 2000 18:32:23 +0000
- Re: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions 30 Dec 1999 13:26:23 +0000
- Re: XML Schemas and Namespaces 31 Dec 1999 15:32:15 +0000
Holger Flörke
- Re: SAX2-beta (2000-01-28) Sun, 30 Jan 2000 10:56:14 +0100
hpyle@agora.co.uk
- Re: XML and database examples Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:04:57 +0000
Hunter, David
- RE: Querying the DOM using XPath Tue, 25 Jan 2000 14:57:33 -0500
- RE: Querying the DOM using XPath Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:18:05 -0500
- RE: MODERATION, etc. Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:58:00 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:16:04 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:40:31 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:03:39 -0500
- RE: Great controversies of XML Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:30:43 -0500
- Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespac e? Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:29:26 -0500
- RE: SAX2 Namespace Support Thu, 6 Jan 2000 10:37:06 -0500
Hutchison, Nigel
- External Entites Usage Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:40:11 +0100
ic\\ddsb/d.d.barnes
- using xt in a webpage Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:42:21 +0000
Indrajit Chaudhuri
- Re: XML Schema --> C++ Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:46:14 +0530
Iresh Mehta
- DTD Parser Mon, 31 Jan 2000 18:49:06 +0530
Ivan Gonzalez
- Unsubscribe xml-dev@ic.ac.uk Thu, 20 Jan 2000 07:06:56 -0800 (PST)
james anderson
- Re: String interning /servers Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:44:14 +0100
- Re: Namespace prefixes optional? Fri, 07 Jan 2000 16:28:23 +0100
- Re: SAX2 NS processing (was Re: Namespace question) Fri, 07 Jan 2000 16:05:14 +0100
- Re: Namespace prefixes optional? Fri, 07 Jan 2000 11:46:00 +0100
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Fri, 07 Jan 2000 11:19:55 +0100
- schemas: why no local type bindings? Thu, 06 Jan 2000 12:38:07 +0100
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Wed, 05 Jan 2000 20:24:44 +0100
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 05 Jan 2000 19:22:44 +0100
- Re: Namespaces and Validating XML Parsers Question Wed, 05 Jan 2000 15:38:46 +0100
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 05 Jan 2000 12:36:43 +0100
- Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces Tue, 04 Jan 2000 21:11:54 +0100
- Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:53:07 +0100
- Re: Hierarchical namespaces? Mon, 03 Jan 2000 12:35:44 +0100
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Mon, 03 Jan 2000 12:11:46 +0100
James Clark
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Sat, 15 Jan 2000 13:06:29 +0700
James Layer
- Re: SAX2: org.xml.sax.helpers.SAXUtils 17 Jan 00 13:01:23 EST
- RE: [RE: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form] 12 Jan 00 16:04:12 EST
- Re: [XMLReader extends Parser???] 12 Jan 00 15:36:25 EST
- Re: [RE: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form] 12 Jan 00 14:42:46 EST
James Robertson
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:04:13 +1100
James Tauber
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:00:27 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:53:38 -0500
Jan Mikael [grabit media]
- unsubscribe Tue, 18 Jan 2000 23:19:10 +0100
Jean Georges PERRIN
- SAX (Introduction, Recomandations, Future...) Mon, 31 Jan 2000 13:53:14 +0100
Jean Marc VANEL
- my XSLT equipment Tue, 25 Jan 2000 09:53:32 +0100
- Applet LotusXSL or Xalan with string input Fri, 21 Jan 2000 19:04:17 +0100
- XML Schema --> C++ Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:42:38 +0100
Jeffrey Welsh
- unsubscribe xml-dev jwelsh@astonbrooke.com Mon, 31 Jan 2000 08:56:45 -0500
- unsubscribe Mon, 31 Jan 2000 07:49:16 -0500
Jeremy Kercheval
- XML Schemas (long winded) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:56:33 -0800
Jerome McDonough
- Re: Oracle & Z39.50- PL/SQL or Java gizmo? Wed, 26 Jan 2000 17:37:38 -0500
- CFP for a workshop on search results Sun, 09 Jan 2000 13:07:00 -0500
Jim Ancona
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:55:49 -0800 (PST)
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:39:48 -0800 (PST)
Jim Garrett
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Sun, 23 Jan 2000 07:04:47 -0600
Jim Layer
- Re: SAX2-beta (2000-01-28) 28 Jan 00 17:32:19 EST
- Re: SAX2: org.xml.sax.helpers.SAXUtils 18 Jan 00 12:34:18 EST
Jim Sweeney
- RE: SAX newbie Q : absolute DTD path in system id Wed, 26 Jan 2000 16:05:23 -0800
- RE: SAX newbie Q : absolute DTD path in system id Wed, 26 Jan 2000 08:15:22 -0800
- SAX newbie Q : absolute DTD path in system id Tue, 25 Jan 2000 12:49:40 -0800
Joe Lapp
- Re: CORBA/RMI vs XML/RDF/XMI Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:29:59 -0500
- Re: Hierarchical namespaces? Fri, 31 Dec 1999 10:09:05 -0500
- Hierarchical namespaces? Wed, 29 Dec 1999 20:44:58 -0500
- Re: Hierarchical namespaces? Wed, 29 Dec 1999 21:34:23 -0500
- Hierarchical namespaces? Wed, 29 Dec 1999 20:44:58 -0500
Joey Cagle
- (no subject) Sun, 30 Jan 2000 12:42:19 -0500
John Aldridge
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:15:31 +0000
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Mon, 10 Jan 2000 17:03:45 +0000
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Fri, 07 Jan 2000 11:06:07 +0000
- Re: Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema Thu, 06 Jan 2000 12:19:20 +0000
- Re: Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:49:43 +0000
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 05 Jan 2000 17:22:19 +0000
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 05 Jan 2000 11:21:51 +0000
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Tue, 04 Jan 2000 18:22:50 +0000
- Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++ Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:13:00 +0000
John Cowan
- Re: Non-Unicode Character Sets Sat, 29 Jan 100 14:20:32 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Simple XML conformance Mon, 17 Jan 100 15:21:26 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Sun, 16 Jan 100 01:41:39 -0500 (EST)
- Re: SAX2: Which license? Sun, 9 Jan 100 23:58:47 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's Thu, 6 Jan 100 22:39:51 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Wish lists for the Holidays Mon, 27 Dec 1999 22:17:02 -0500 (EST)
John Hicks
- Re: Does anyone know of such a tool [SQL results as XML] Tue, 18 Jan 2000 04:22:06 -0500
John Lam
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:18:46 -0500
John Robert Gardner
- Oracle & Z39.50- PL/SQL or Java gizmo? Wed, 26 Jan 2000 09:42:39 -0500 (EST)
- Re: ?Simple XML parser for Mac's Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:47:10 -0500 (EST)
- Re: file extension naming conventions Fri, 14 Jan 2000 20:18:16 -0500 (EST)
- EI5 Message with Entities (fwd) Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:20:09 -0500 (EST)
- Re: To Oracle or NOT to Oracle Wed, 5 Jan 2000 10:15:54 -0500 (EST)
- Re: To Oracle or NOT to Oracle Wed, 5 Jan 2000 10:11:11 -0500 (EST)
john@intronet.com
- unsubscribe Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:33:25 -0000
- (no subject) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:27:06 -0000
Jon Bosak
- Fwd: WWW9 registration now open Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:57:35 -0800 (PST)
- OASIS work (was: Re: SAX2 Namespace Support) Thu, 6 Jan 2000 11:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Jon Smirl
- Re: Geoworks and their patent Sun, 23 Jan 2000 12:47:55 -0500
Joshua E. Smith
- Sorry, off topic Sun, 23 Jan 2000 09:52:10 -0500
- Re: XML for 3D geometry and objects Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:19:03 -0500
Jun Fujisawa
- ANNOUNCE: AElfred XML Parser for Palm Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:27:04 +0900
- Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:56:18 +0900
Keith Pendergrass 215250
- unsubscribe Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:34:48 -0600
KenB
- Re: Hyphens vs underscores in element names Wed, 26 Jan 2000 09:09:54 -0500
- Re: XML Schema --> C++ Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:04:21 -0500
KenNorth
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 2000 12:11:11 -0800
- SAX and Pig Poop Mon, 24 Jan 2000 19:09:54 -0800
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:31:23 -0800
- Re: XML in databases Mon, 27 Dec 1999 12:01:00 -0800
Kevin A. Burton
- RSS 0.92??? Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:02:25 -0800
Kieran O'Shea
- Problem with substituting XSL @ variable into a hyper link Fri, 21 Jan 2000 16:02:01 -0000
- Generating Drop Down HTML tags with XSL Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:55:41 -0000
L. C. Rees
- Portable Site Information Wed, 12 Jan 2000 08:56:30 -0800
Langer, Paul
- RE: Hyphens vs underscores in element names Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:21:30 +0100
Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset 28 Jan 2000 15:52:18 +0100
- Re: Seeking a Dao of Groves 28 Jan 2000 14:18:48 +0100
- Re: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset 27 Jan 2000 11:10:51 +0100
- Re: SAX2: pull interface 20 Jan 2000 10:10:25 +0100
- Re: SAX2 and data types (was: Character Tugging) 19 Jan 2000 14:21:11 +0100
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) 13 Jan 2000 09:52:04 +0100
- Re: document generation 11 Jan 2000 17:01:18 +0100
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form 10 Jan 2000 18:50:26 +0100
- Re: SAX2: Which license? 10 Jan 2000 17:49:56 +0100
LaShika M
- XML & Databases Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:04:01 -0800
Lauren Wood
- Re: is a prefix without a namespace legal? Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:54:41 -0800
- Re: Wish lists for the Holidays Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:29:40 -0800
- Re: DOM and editing [was WISH!...] Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:18:50 -0800
- Re: WISH! Open Source XML Editor Wed, 5 Jan 2000 20:37:55 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Wed, 5 Jan 2000 12:15:16 -0800
- Re: Xpath and DOM Tue, 4 Jan 2000 14:38:21 -0800
Lee Anne Phillips
- RE: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:50:50 -0800
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Mon, 24 Jan 2000 22:52:06 -0800
- Re: R: interesting data point on preferred computers/browser types Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:24:16 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:26:33 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:31:47 -0800
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:30:04 -0800
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article.> Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:36:52 -0800
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:59:22 -0800
Leigh Dodds
- RE: Why didn't I get a digest today, and why wasn't my yesterday's posting archived? Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:22:29 -0000
- RE: Naming the SAX2 thingy Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:31:23 -0000
- RE: SAX2: ParserFactory Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:30:36 -0000
- RE: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:55:20 -0000
- RE: SAX2 Namespace Support Thu, 6 Jan 2000 15:55:37 -0000
- RE: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:47:06 -0000
- RE: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 5 Jan 2000 10:51:46 -0000
Len Bullard
- Re: Seeking a Dao of Groves Fri, 28 Jan 2000 20:07:24 -0600
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Wed, 26 Jan 2000 18:18:06 -0600
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 2000 21:02:42 -0600
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 2000 20:48:59 -0600
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:33:52 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:25:38 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Sun, 23 Jan 2000 21:40:19 -0600
- Re: Geoworks and their patent Sun, 23 Jan 2000 21:42:37 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:00:04 -0600
- Re: XML for 3D geometry and objects Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:06:50 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:30:43 -0600
- Re: My browser is longer than your browser Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:18:45 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:42:08 -0600
- Re: XML for 3D geometry and objects Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:58:27 -0600
- Re: Robert Burns works available as XML(2) Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:13:10 -0600
- Re: Extensible browsers Thu, 20 Jan 2000 13:08:33 -0600
- Re: Extensible browsers Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:41:59 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:05:37 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:06:53 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 15:23:08 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:53:47 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:45:53 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:50:49 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:43:38 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:41:33 -0600
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:48:16 -0600
- Re: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:28:50 -0600
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:19:14 -0600
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:02:18 -0600
- Re: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Sun, 16 Jan 2000 14:16:05 -0600
- Re: Great controversies of XML Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:11:17 -0600
- Re: Draft of Paper: Using UML to Define XML DTDs Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:09:27 -0600
- Re: Great controversies of XML Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:58:03 -0600
- Re: Great controversies of XML Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:50:46 -0600
- Re: Well-formed and valid Sun, 09 Jan 2000 17:24:49 -0600
- Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions Tue, 28 Dec 1999 18:11:50 -0600
Lennart Staflin
- Re: PSGML-1.2.1 problems 05 Jan 2000 21:45:16 +0100
lennon.kaku@jamicon.com.tw
- unsubscribe Fri, 14 Jan 2000 21:47:38 +0800
Liam R. E. Quin
- Typography tutorial slides on the web Fri, 31 Dec 1999 00:17:50 -0500 (EST)
Lisa Rein
- Re: interesting data point on preferred computers/browser types Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:06:08 -0800
- Re: interesting data point on preferred computers/browser types Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:52:42 -0800
- Re: SML Status Report Sun, 09 Jan 2000 09:31:20 -0800
- Re: SML Status Report Sat, 08 Jan 2000 18:31:38 -0800
Lucio Nomy Delgado Vasquez
- unsubscribe Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:05:27 -0500
Lucio Piccoli
- Element_node.getValue() Thu, 30 Dec 1999 14:23:51 -0000
Marcus Carr
- Re: Mixed-content use-cases and questions Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:12:20 +1100
- Re: Mixed-content use-cases and questions Wed, 12 Jan 2000 15:30:27 +1100
- Re: Mixed-content use-cases and questions Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:26:13 +1100
- Re: Namespace prefixes optional? Tue, 11 Jan 2000 08:59:08 +1100
- Re: Namespace prefixes optional? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:26:02 +1100
Martin Lilienthal
- Java XML-Parser Sun, 23 Jan 2000 10:44:37 -0800
Michael Anderson
- Re: XML Schema support for Interoperability? Fri, 28 Jan 2000 11:46:34 +1100
Michael Champion
- Re: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset Tue, 25 Jan 2000 14:22:07 -0500
- Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?) Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:35:25 -0500
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article.> Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:31:50 -0500
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article.> Mon, 17 Jan 2000 02:01:18 -0500
- Re: Element_node.getValue() Thu, 30 Dec 1999 10:54:00 -0500
Michael Rose
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:53:58 +0100
Michael Rossi
- RE: XML vs. CORBA (was RE: Alternatives to browsers) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 16:49:19 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:34:56 -0500
- RE: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions Thu, 30 Dec 1999 16:29:38 -0500
- RE: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions Thu, 30 Dec 1999 12:46:28 -0500
- RE: Wish lists for the Holidays Tue, 28 Dec 1999 17:15:05 -0500
Michael Rys
- RE: XML & Databases Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:25:02 -0800
- RE: XML & Databases Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:30:03 -0800
Miles Sabin
- RE: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals. Mon, 31 Jan 2000 18:45:25 -0000
- ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals. Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:15:28 -0000
- RE: SAX2-beta (2000-01-28) Fri, 28 Jan 2000 19:16:07 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:24:47 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:53:35 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:44:37 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:39:02 -0000
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:26:23 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:14:39 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 18:37:06 -0000
- RE: SAX2: pull interface Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:24:04 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:56:58 -0000
- RE: SAX2: pull interface Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:06:42 -0000
- RE: SAX2: DOM support Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:51:53 -0000
- RE: String interning Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:43:28 -0000
- RE: String interning Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:24:14 -0000
- RE: String interning Fri, 14 Jan 2000 22:00:50 -0000
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Fri, 14 Jan 2000 20:29:12 -0000
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Fri, 14 Jan 2000 19:33:10 -0000
- RE: Naming the SAX2 thingy Fri, 14 Jan 2000 17:55:45 -0000
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:39:50 -0000
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:54:54 -0000
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:04:27 -0000
- RE: SAX2: ParserFactory Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:49:19 -0000
- SAX2: ParserFactory Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:56:22 -0000
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:02:40 -0000
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:57:11 -0000
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 20:06:35 -0000
- RE: [RE: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form] Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:55:13 -0000
- String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:04:04 -0000
- RE: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:01:13 -0000
- RE: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Wed, 5 Jan 2000 20:09:18 -0000
- RE: SAX2: Parser interface Wed, 5 Jan 2000 11:51:04 -0000
- RE: SAX2: Parser interface Tue, 4 Jan 2000 12:04:04 -0000
Miloslav Nic
- Zvon DTD and XML tutorials available for downloads Tue, 18 Jan 2000 07:00:48 +0100
- Zvon tutorial: Mozilla Tue, 18 Jan 2000 06:45:07 +0100
- A new Zvon tutorial - DTD Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:33:40 +0100
Murali
- unsubscribe Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:59:03 -0500
Muralidhar Devarapalli
- Re: Java XML-Parser Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:23:57 PST
MURATA Makoto
- Fwd: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-02.txt Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:44:23 +0900
Nikita Vinokurov
- XML Schema API Sat, 8 Jan 2000 12:05:36 +0300
- XMLSchema implementation Thu, 6 Jan 2000 13:33:50 +0300
Nils Klarlund
- Re: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset 28 Jan 2000 12:17:44 -0500
- Re: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset 27 Jan 2000 12:55:38 -0500
- Re: Arrgh! - FW: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset Tue, 25 Jan 2000 12:02:15 -0500
- Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset 24 Jan 2000 10:49:07 -0500
- Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider? Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:49:44 -0500
- Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider? Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:15:44 -0500
- XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider? Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:22:33 -0500
Norman Gray
- Re: Auxiliary parses/subdocuments in XML Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:39:55 +0000 (GMT)
- Auxiliary parses/subdocuments in XML Mon, 24 Jan 2000 17:03:50 +0000 (GMT)
Oliver Becker
- Re: Your Message Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:20:10 +0100 (MET)
Oren Ben-Kiki
- Fw: Re: Namespace prefixes optional? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:00:15 +0200
Paich, Jason
- unsubscribe Sun, 23 Jan 2000 06:21:33 -0800
- ASP2XML Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:30:11 -0800
Paul Grosso
- Last Call for Canonical XML Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:53:05 -0600
- Re: java pull parser / fragment processing Mon, 27 Dec 1999 13:27:42 -0600
- Re: java pull parser / fragment processing Mon, 27 Dec 1999 10:50:04 -0600
Paul H Simonsen
- Re: XML vs. CORBA (was RE: Alternatives to browsers) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:54:45 -0600
- Re: Does anyone know of such a tool.... Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:44:29 -0600
Paul Miller
- Announce: XMLIO v0.6 released - push data/CDATA/comments Sat, 08 Jan 2000 08:47:13 -0500
- ANNOUNCE: XMLIO 0.5 with C and C++ implementation Sat, 01 Jan 2000 12:50:16 -0500
Paul Prescod
- Re: Seeking a Dao of Groves Mon, 31 Jan 2000 03:06:42 -0600
- Non-Unicode Character Sets Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:05:47 -0600
- Re: FW: Arrgh! - FW: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0,DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset Tue, 25 Jan 2000 19:16:26 -0500
- VCRs and the Web Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:14:17 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Which license? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 14:31:00 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Which license? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:25:00 -0800
Paul Tchistopolskii
- ANNOUNCE. PXSLServlet v 0.2 Sun, 23 Jan 2000 20:59:33 -0800
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:46:30 -0800
Pete Johnston
- Re: External Entites Usage Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:31:37 GMT
Peter Murray-Rust
- Re: Introduction Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:10:03 +0000
- EDITORIAL (was: Re: Seeking a Dao of Groves) Sat, 29 Jan 2000 13:37:16 +0000
- Re: ANN: SAX2-beta (2000-01-28) Sat, 29 Jan 2000 14:46:11 +0000
- Re: Hyphens vs underscores in element names Wed, 26 Jan 2000 08:45:10 +0000
- Re: Further work on Xlink Wed, 26 Jan 2000 00:04:42 +0000
- Re: Further work on Xlink Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:54:52 +0000
- EDITORIAL Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:59:35 +0000
- MODERATION [was: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)] Mon, 24 Jan 2000 08:57:40 +0000
- MODERATION, etc. Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:43:07 +0000
- LISTADMIN - SIZE and CONTENT [was RE: Generating Drop Down HTML tags with XSL] Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:21:57 +0000
- IMPORTANT: UNSUBSCRIBING Thu, 20 Jan 2000 01:04:39 +0000
- Invited XML-DEVers [was RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article] Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:38:24 +0000
- Re: Simple XML conformance Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:47:31 +0000
- Simple XML conformance Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:19:28 +0000
- IMPORTANT: MODERATION [Was Re: [Xml] Inventory] Sat, 15 Jan 2000 23:07:42 +0000
- Re: SAX2: Which license? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:18:55 +0000
- DOM and editing [was WISH!...] Fri, 07 Jan 2000 12:08:20 +0000
- Millennium greetings Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:03:27 +0000
Peter S. Housel
- Re: Unicode confusion Tue, 4 Jan 2000 12:02:26 -0800
Peter Zingg
- Any public source code for an XML Schema (12/17/99) checker out t here? Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:03:42 -0800
Philip Nye
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Wed, 26 Jan 2000 23:05:00 +0000
pmalone2@csc.com
- To Oracle or NOT to Oracle Wed, 5 Jan 2000 09:11:13 -0500
POTHIN Cedric
- unsubscribe Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:58:42 +0100
- (no subject) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:49:14 +0100
- (no subject) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:48:48 +0100
prakash tripathi
- (no subject) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 09:57:56 -0800 (PST)
- (no subject) Tue, 11 Jan 2000 14:12:29 -0800 (PST)
prasadm@crt.com
- RE: Creating HTML tags through XSL. Mon, 31 Jan 2000 10:30:28 -0600
- Creating HTML tags through XSL. Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:46:10 -0600
- Does anyone know of such a tool.... Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:44:16 -0600
Prashant Walke
- unsubcribe 30 Dec 99 07:34:57 MST
Preeti Soni
- unsubscribe Fri, 21 Jan 2000 19:49:31 +0530 (IST)
Rahul Chugh
- (no subject) Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:42:34 +0530
- (no subject) Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:35:52 +0530
- (no subject) Thu, 27 Jan 2000 10:54:26 +0530
- (no subject) Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:07:54 +0530
Rajani Kanth
- Unsubscribe Mon, 31 Jan 2000 17:09:00 +0530
Rajeev Nagpal
- unsubscribe Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:25:36 +0530
Ralph Cramer
- unsubscribe Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:51:22 +0100
- unsubscribe Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:20:34 +0100
Randy Bryan
- Re: xml-dev Digest V1 #365 Mon, 17 Jan 1972 12:01:54 -0500 (EST)
ravikumar munta
- Re: unsubscribe xml-dev Sat, 29 Jan 2000 18:32:39 EST
- unsubscribe xml-dev Sat, 29 Jan 2000 18:07:46 EST
- (no subject) Sat, 22 Jan 2000 14:17:05 EST
- Re: Robert Burns works available as XML(2) Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:35:21 EST
- (no subject) Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:38:57 EST
- (no subject) Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:39:09 EST
Ray Waldin
- Re: CamelCase names for XML elements vs. property names for Java bean s Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:58:14 -0800
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Thu, 06 Jan 2000 16:48:09 -0800
Ray Whitmer
- Re: The DOM: the realist and the implementer Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:13:14 -0700
- Re: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:14:24 -0700
- Re: The DOM: the realist and the implementer Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:14:12 -0700
- Re: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Mon, 17 Jan 2000 07:11:53 -0700
- Re: The DOM: the realist and the implementer Sat, 15 Jan 2000 20:12:46 -0700
- Re: The DOM and the victim, the iconoclast and the believer Sat, 15 Jan 2000 20:00:45 -0700
- Re: SML Status Report Mon, 10 Jan 2000 09:26:06 -0700 (MST)
- Re: is a prefix without a namespace legal? Fri, 07 Jan 2000 07:00:31 -0700
- Re: two little DOM2 questions... Fri, 07 Jan 2000 06:38:28 -0700
- Re: two little DOM2 questions... Thu, 06 Jan 2000 19:53:15 -0700
rev-bob@gotc.com
- re: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) 23 Jan 00 10:11:24 -0500
- re: Re: Alternatives to the W3C 20 Jan 00 10:37:01 -0500
- re: Re: Namespace prefixes optional? 10 Jan 00 11:57:04 -0500
- re: Re: Namespace prefixes optional? 09 Jan 00 17:57:45 -0500
Reynolds, Gregg
- RE: Costs of the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:49:28 -0600
- biblioml Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:29:27 -0600
Ricardo Toledo Chavez
- (no subject) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:39:11 -0600
Rich Bunis
- Unsubscribe Tue, 25 Jan 2000 09:44:31 -0600
- unsubscribe Thu, 20 Jan 2000 08:21:02 -0600
Richard Anderson
- A Nice Chapter on SAX Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:52:19 -0000
- Re: DOM... Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:55:29 -0000
- Re: SAX2: Which license? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 15:56:28 -0000
Richard Lanyon
- ANNOUNCE: New release of X-Tract/XML Script Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:06:30 +0000 (GMT)
- RE: Naming the SAX2 thingy Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:40:39 +0000 (GMT)
Richard Tobin
- Re: a case in OASIS test suite 28 Jan 2000 14:21:16 GMT
- Re: Attribute normalisation and character entities 28 Jan 2000 01:28:15 GMT
- Re: Attribute normalisation and character entities 27 Jan 2000 23:26:57 GMT
- Re: a case in OASIS test suite 27 Jan 2000 13:24:41 GMT
- Re: Problem in understanding rule [14] of XML spec 27 Jan 2000 13:14:32 GMT
- Re: Attribute normalisation and character entities 26 Jan 2000 13:02:32 GMT
- Re: Attribute normalisation and character entities 25 Jan 2000 15:11:54 GMT
- Re: Auxiliary parses/subdocuments in XML 24 Jan 2000 18:14:00 GMT
- Attribute normalisation and character entities 24 Jan 2000 15:05:26 GMT
- quotes in canonical forms 18 Jan 2000 16:49:42 GMT
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions Tue, 28 Dec 1999 14:47:03 +0800
Rob Nichols
- RE: What happened to XSL? Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:40:27 -0800
Robert Hanson
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:53:38 -0500
- Help needed with the XPointer spec Tue, 4 Jan 2000 17:56:27 -0500
- What happened to XSL? Thu, 30 Dec 1999 13:57:54 -0500
Robert King
- unsunscribe Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:52:20 -0700
Robert La Quey
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Sun, 16 Jan 2000 17:18:37 -0800
Robin Cover
- Re: Seeking a Dao of Groves Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:48:32 -0600 (CST)
roddey@us.ibm.com
- Re: Non-Unicode Character Sets Mon, 31 Jan 2000 15:52:07 -0700
- RE: SAX2 Namespace Support Mon, 10 Jan 2000 13:18:12 -0700
- Re: Unicode confusion Mon, 10 Jan 2000 12:48:44 -0700
- Unicode confusion Mon, 10 Jan 2000 12:44:25 -0700
- (no subject) Mon, 3 Jan 2000 16:30:40 -0700
- Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++ Mon, 3 Jan 2000 16:28:09 -0700
Roger Costello
- XML Schema Question: attributing an element with a datatype? Sun, 30 Jan 2000 13:49:26 -0500
- Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces Mon, 03 Jan 2000 15:44:40 -0500
- Specifying scope of uniqueness in XML Schemas? Mon, 03 Jan 2000 11:45:58 -0500
- null vs empty in XML Schemas Sun, 02 Jan 2000 07:58:30 -0500
- XML Schemas and Namespaces Fri, 31 Dec 1999 07:58:32 -0500
- (Many) XML Schema Questions Mon, 27 Dec 1999 17:15:08 -0500
Roger L. Costello
- Re: XML Schema Question: attributing an element with a datatype? Mon, 31 Jan 2000 06:51:44 -0500
- XML Schema support for Interoperability? Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:56:43 -0500
- ANN: XML Schema Tutorial Thu, 06 Jan 2000 07:45:46 -0500
- Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema Tue, 04 Jan 2000 09:22:49 -0500
- No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions Thu, 30 Dec 1999 07:03:49 -0500
- XML Schema Question: How to indicate an XML document conforms to an XML Schema Wed, 29 Dec 1999 07:58:15 -0500
- XML Schema Question: understanding equivClass and abstract Thu, 30 Dec 1999 08:32:19 -0500
Rolande Kendal
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:34:40 -0500
ross
- Re: ?Simple XML parser for Mac's Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:35:43 -0500
- xmlonthemac.com Tue, 18 Jan 2000 00:32:02 -0500
Rzepa, Henry
- LISTADMIN: Update on list transfer to OASIS Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:00:35 +0000
- Re: ?Simple XML parser for Mac's Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:21:26 +0000
Sajeev M.
- RE: XML in databases Mon, 27 Dec 1999 17:53:02 +0530
schnitz@overflow.de
- RE: Wish lists for the Holidays Tue, 4 Jan 2000 15:34:01 +0000
Sean Mc Grath
- Re: expat tree-builder (dom) Mon, 24 Jan 2000 19:13:14 +0000
- Re: Hierarchical namespaces? Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:20:47 +0000
Sean McGrath
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 08:48:14 +0000
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Tue, 18 Jan 2000 03:41:10 +0000
- Re: SML Status Report Sun, 09 Jan 2000 10:58:25 +0000
Sean Oconnor
- unsubscribe xml-dev Mon, 24 Jan 2000 02:05:18 -0000
Sebastian Rahtz
- Re: XML: A outside perspective Fri, 28 Jan 2000 09:26:18 +0000 (GMT)
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:58:30 +0000 (GMT)
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:52:18 +0000 (GMT)
Simon North
- Re: Seeking a Dao of Groves Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:50:58 +0100
- Re: [Xml] Inventory Fri, 14 Jan 2000 14:56:08 +0100
Simon St.Laurent
- query language Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:59:05 -0500
- Re: XML: A outside perspective Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:55:36 -0500
- has anyone seen Blocks? Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:27:22 -0500
- RE: Arrgh! - FW: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:16:22 -0500
- Re: Further work on Xlink Tue, 25 Jan 2000 11:07:17 -0500
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 2000 09:52:12 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Sun, 23 Jan 2000 08:17:37 -0500
- RE: Extensible browsers Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:32:58 -0500
- Extensible browsers Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:08:34 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:31:47 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:00:47 -0500
- ANNOUNCE: XML Elements of Style Tue, 18 Jan 2000 18:36:33 -0500
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:00:35 -0500
- XML vs. CORBA (was RE: Alternatives to browsers) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:53:42 -0500
- Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:32:12 -0500
- Re: Simple XML conformance Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:22:46 -0500
- Re: Costs of the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:13:34 -0500
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:59:49 -0500
- Re: tricky XHTML 1.0 namespace question Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:41:16 -0500
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:26:18 -0500
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:08:26 -0500
- tricky XHTML 1.0 namespace question Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:05:10 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:37:18 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:37:07 -0500
- Alternatives to the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:13:02 -0500
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:43:12 -0500
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Sun, 16 Jan 2000 21:00:48 -0500
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Sat, 15 Jan 2000 13:58:43 -0500
- Re: Great controversies of XML Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:18:16 -0500
- RE: Great controversies of XML Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:37:31 -0500
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:40:34 -0500
- RE: Great controversies of XML Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:47:01 -0500
- Great controversies of XML Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:52:54 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:22:40 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:03:15 -0500
- Re: SML Status Report Sat, 08 Jan 2000 21:56:46 -0500
- Re: hierarchical database for repository Sat, 08 Jan 2000 17:08:16 -0500
- hierarchical database for repository Fri, 07 Jan 2000 18:23:13 -0500
- Re: SAX2 NS processing (was Re: Namespace question) Fri, 07 Jan 2000 09:20:46 -0500
- SAX2 NS processing (was Re: Namespace question) Fri, 07 Jan 2000 08:36:37 -0500
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Thu, 06 Jan 2000 19:30:17 -0500
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Thu, 06 Jan 2000 16:11:34 -0500
- Re: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions Thu, 30 Dec 1999 09:47:46 -0500
- Re: Wish lists for the Holidays Mon, 27 Dec 1999 22:39:25 -0500
- Re: Wish lists for the Holidays Mon, 27 Dec 1999 21:42:49 -0500
- RE: Wish lists for the Holidays Mon, 27 Dec 1999 21:46:38 -0500
Sophie MABILAT
- Questions of a beginner... Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:32:52 +0100
- (no subject) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:52:22 +0100
- DOM... Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:53:57 +0100
- SAX ? Tue, 4 Jan 2000 15:10:10 +0100
- Beginner's questions... Fri, 31 Dec 1999 15:20:30 +0100
ssdhanoa@us.ibm.com
- New XML/XSL Technologies & Updates Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:43:15 -0700
- XML4C++ 3.0.1 & XML Lightweight Extractor Tue, 4 Jan 2000 12:18:58 -0700
Stan
- unsubscribe Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:52:23 -0500
Stefan Haustein
- #PCDATA "element": Yes! Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:30:20 +0100
- Re: Hyphens vs underscores in element names Wed, 26 Jan 2000 15:47:42 +0100
- Re: Derivation by Restriction Sun, 23 Jan 2000 13:11:14 +0100
- let's get back to work... Sat, 22 Jan 2000 15:12:41 +0100
- Re: SAX2: pull interface Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:16:44 +0100
- Re: SAX2: pull interface Tue, 18 Jan 2000 18:05:48 +0100
- Re: Naming the SAX2 thingy Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:18:35 +0100
- org.xml.sax.helpers.InternMap ? Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:08:46 +0100
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Wed, 12 Jan 2000 21:35:48 +0100
- Re: document generation Mon, 10 Jan 2000 19:26:38 +0100
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Mon, 10 Jan 2000 19:12:07 +0100
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Mon, 10 Jan 2000 18:26:01 +0100
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Mon, 10 Jan 2000 17:19:36 +0100
- Attribute defaulting to element NS may cause problems (was: Re: SAX2 NS processing (was Re: Namespace question)) Fri, 07 Jan 2000 16:25:22 +0100
- is a prefix without a namespace legal? Fri, 07 Jan 2000 12:58:35 +0100
- Re: two little DOM2 questions... (corrected) Fri, 07 Jan 2000 12:49:25 +0100
- Re: two little DOM2 questions... Fri, 07 Jan 2000 12:02:01 +0100
- two little DOM2 questions... Fri, 07 Jan 2000 00:03:39 +0100
- Re: WISH! Open Source XML Editor Thu, 06 Jan 2000 11:40:52 +0100
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:56:28 +0100
- SAX2: AttributeList ?!? Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:42:32 +0100
- Re: sax2: cdata, characters and ignorable whitespace Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:23:09 +0100
- sax2: cdata, characters and ignorable whitespace Tue, 04 Jan 2000 13:58:19 +0100
- added namespace support to pull parser Mon, 03 Jan 2000 22:40:44 +0100
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support Sun, 02 Jan 2000 03:13:26 +0100
- Re: java pull parser / fragment processing Mon, 27 Dec 1999 21:57:01 +0100
- Re: java pull parser / fragment processing Mon, 27 Dec 1999 18:45:40 +0100
Steinar Bang
- Re: SAX2: pull interface 19 Jan 2000 18:00:53 +0100
- Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) 19 Jan 2000 18:04:11 +0100
- XML and database examples 19 Jan 2000 15:17:14 +0100
- Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft 04 Jan 2000 10:04:45 +0100
- Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++ 04 Jan 2000 08:40:05 +0100
- Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft 27 Dec 1999 22:24:55 +0100
- Re: SAX/C++: GCJ and CNI 29 Dec 1999 10:14:32 +0100
- Re: SAX/C++: GCJ and CNI 29 Dec 1999 22:24:24 +0100
Stephen R. Savitzky
- Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) 20 Jan 2000 14:00:06 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C 20 Jan 2000 12:01:25 -0800
Steve Ball
- Re: Introduction Mon, 31 Jan 2000 23:07:23 -0500
Steve Muench
- Re: XML -> Java code generator. Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:48:07 -0800
- Re: XML and database examples Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:56:19 -0800
- Re: XML & Databases Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:09:56 -0800
- Re: Does anyone know of such a tool.... Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:18:20 -0800
- Re: Namespaces and XSLT simplified syntax Sun, 9 Jan 2000 19:39:59 -0800
- ANN: Oracle XSQL Pages & XSQL Servlet 0.9.8.6 Sat, 8 Jan 2000 01:09:23 -0800
- Re: To Oracle or NOT to Oracle Wed, 5 Jan 2000 09:06:40 -0800
Steve Schafer
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Fri, 07 Jan 2000 00:04:12 -0600
- Re: unicode confusion Tue, 04 Jan 2000 13:25:04 -0600
Steven Champeon
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Sat, 22 Jan 2000 01:35:16 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:46:38 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:50:47 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:40:01 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:21:23 -0500 (EST)
- file extension naming conventions Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:54:13 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Great controversies of XML Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:18:49 -0500 (EST)
Steven Livingstone
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:52:10 -0000
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:57:59 -0000
- Re: [Xml] Inventory Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:15:36 -0000
Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
- W3C XML Signatures WD Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:38:43 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:44:28 -0000
- RE: VCRs and the Web Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:45:52 -0000
- XML Certificates Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:05:07 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:53:50 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:44:02 -0000
- RE: Extensible browsers Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:37:07 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:34:01 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:16:35 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:05:45 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:22:17 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:59:07 -0000
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:28:54 -0000
Steven R. Newcomb
- Re: ANN: XTech 2000 in San Jose Mon, 31 Jan 2000 13:29:55 -0600
- Re: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:39:02 -0600
- Re: Microsoft's response to XML.com article Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:16:54 -0600
Sunker
- Unsubscribe Mon, 31 Jan 2000 18:27:22 +0800
Tagore Smith
- RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects Fri, 21 Jan 2000 16:13:46 -0500 (EST)
Takuki Kamiya
- Re: ANN: SAX2-beta (2000-01-28) Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:31:10 +0900
- Re: a case in OASIS test suite Sat, 29 Jan 2000 13:30:05 +0900
- Re: a case in OASIS test suite Fri, 28 Jan 2000 22:06:14 +0900
- a case in OASIS test suite Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:48:57 +0900
Terje Norderhaug
- [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Sun, 23 Jan 2000 20:15:29 -0800
- RE: Geoworks and their patent Sun, 23 Jan 2000 11:45:07 -0800
- Re: Geoworks and their patent Sun, 23 Jan 2000 11:31:27 -0800
- RE: Geoworks and their patent Sun, 23 Jan 2000 10:41:47 -0800
Teun Duynstee
- How are attributes handled in Ranges? Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:19:50 +0100
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: Attribute normalisation and character entities Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:54:24 -0500
- Re: EDITORIAL Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:30:39 -0500
- Re: More Nonce About CORBA Mon, 24 Jan 2000 08:31:24 -0500
- Re: MODERATION [was: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)] Mon, 24 Jan 2000 08:39:27 -0500
- Re: Geoworks and their patent Sun, 23 Jan 2000 16:24:04 -0500
- Re: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?) Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:17:04 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:03:08 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 23:47:47 -0500
- Re: xml with xsl Mon, 3 Jan 2000 08:37:19 -0500
THOMAS PASSIN
- Re: Creating HTML tags through XSL. Fri, 28 Jan 2000 20:25:23 -0500
- Re: XML: A outside perspective Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:45:31 -0500
- Re: Attribute normalisation and character entities Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:25:50 -0500
Tim Bray
- Re: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, andXML Infoset Sun, 30 Jan 2000 20:45:16 -0800
- Re: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:35:27 -0800
- Re: Non-Unicode Character Sets Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:03:14 -0800
- Ahh, springtime in IETF-land Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:45:23 -0800
- Re: Attribute normalisation and character entities Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:21:36 -0800
- Re: xml:lang: Am I doing more work than I need to be? Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:33:25 -0800
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Tue, 25 Jan 2000 06:55:36 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:21:13 -0800
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Sun, 23 Jan 2000 17:07:40 -0800
- Re: MODERATION, etc. Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:33:11 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:10:24 -0800
- Re: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?) Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:29:46 -0800
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:29:46 -0800
- RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:32:36 -0800
- Re: XML for 3D geometry and objects Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:36:31 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:58:41 -0800
- RE: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 20:47:02 -0800
- Re: XML and database examples Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:51:43 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:51:44 -0800
- RE: Alternatives to browsers (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 08:56:32 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:37:42 -0800
- RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:21:01 -0800
- Re: Costs of the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:16:04 -0800
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:46:23 -0800
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:37:54 -0800
- Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article Sat, 15 Jan 2000 13:42:32 -0800
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:57:15 -0800
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:57:15 -0800
- Re: Great controversies of XML Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:10:44 -0800
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:36:15 -0800
- Re: External Entites Usage Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:56:30 -0800
- RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:42:17 -0800
- Re: Mixed-content use-cases and questions Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:36:58 -0800
- Re: Mixed-content use-cases and questions Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:04:22 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Which license? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 11:25:56 -0800
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Mon, 10 Jan 2000 09:49:59 -0800
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Thu, 06 Jan 2000 16:57:39 -0800
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Thu, 06 Jan 2000 13:23:51 -0800
- Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace? Thu, 06 Jan 2000 12:14:29 -0800
- Re: Namespace prefixes optional? Thu, 06 Jan 2000 11:39:51 -0800
- RE: SAX2 Namespace Support Thu, 06 Jan 2000 09:08:52 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Wed, 05 Jan 2000 12:00:44 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Wed, 05 Jan 2000 11:52:39 -0800
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:57:42 -0800
- Re: unicode confusion Tue, 04 Jan 2000 11:07:24 -0800
- Re: Hierarchical namespaces? Wed, 29 Dec 1999 18:00:18 -0800
- Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions Mon, 27 Dec 1999 20:01:15 -0800
tmmet tvp
- XML and java Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:41:20 PST
- Unicode Support Mon, 10 Jan 2000 12:47:26 PST
- Filter by keyword..... Tue, 04 Jan 2000 18:46:16 PST
- Sorting,filtering and search Mon, 03 Jan 2000 09:23:50 PST
- Filtering and sorting using xsl Thu, 30 Dec 1999 17:54:34 PST
Toby Speight
- Web browsers and editors (was: Alternatives to the W3C) 25 Jan 2000 12:36:52 +0000
- Re: String interning 19 Jan 2000 15:07:05 +0000
- Re: String interning 17 Jan 2000 19:33:29 +0000
- Re: SAX2 Namespace Support 13 Jan 2000 10:56:50 +0000
Toivo Lainevool
- Re: Survey: Catalysis Templates Wed, 29 Dec 1999 09:37:20 -0800 (PST)
Tolkin, Steve
- Why didn't I get a digest today, and why wasn't my yesterday's po sting archived? Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:56:02 -0500
twleung@sauria.com
- Re: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException? Mon, 27 Dec 1999 15:01:50 -0800
Tyler Baker
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Wed, 26 Jan 2000 19:10:34 -0500
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Wed, 26 Jan 2000 16:50:01 -0500
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Wed, 26 Jan 2000 16:17:35 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 22:11:25 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:53:38 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:46:38 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 20:25:44 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:47:27 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 01:22:39 -0500
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:56:21 -0500
- Re: String interning /servers Tue, 18 Jan 2000 21:19:52 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Tue, 18 Jan 2000 01:30:23 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Mon, 17 Jan 2000 19:17:12 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Mon, 17 Jan 2000 19:05:34 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Mon, 17 Jan 2000 18:00:07 -0500
- Re: String interning Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:40:30 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:21:50 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:12:10 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:52:54 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:29:18 -0500
- Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:45:12 -0500
- Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:44:40 -0500
Uche Ogbuji
- ANN: 4DOM 0.9.2 Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:35:31 -0700
- ANN: 4DOM 0.9.1 Tue, 04 Jan 2000 02:18:23 -0700
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
- Seeking a Dao of Groves Fri, 28 Jan 2000 03:09:23 -0700
- More Nonce About CORBA Mon, 24 Jan 2000 00:37:51 -0700
- Re: Wish lists for the Holidays Wed, 05 Jan 2000 21:21:34 -0700
- Re: SAX2: Namespace Processing and NSUtils helper class Wed, 05 Jan 2000 21:14:25 -0700
- Re: Wish lists for the Holidays Tue, 28 Dec 1999 19:54:39 -0700
V P Krishnan
- Re: [techspace] Re: Questions related to XML Thu, 6 Jan 2000 18:41:02 -0700
Vane Lashua
- RE: hierarchical database for repository Mon, 10 Jan 2000 13:24:01 -0500
- RE: Element_node.getValue() Thu, 30 Dec 1999 13:09:51 -0500
vibha verma
- unsubscribe Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:54:24 -0700
Vilya Harvey
- Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent Mon, 24 Jan 2000 14:33:35 +0000
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:32:43 +0000
- Re: Alternatives to the W3C Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:18:43 +0000
- Re: SAX2: pull interface Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:31:27 +0000
- Re: Naming the SAX2 thingy Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:46:17 +0000
Vita Prihatoni
- Happy Millenium... Mon, 3 Jan 2000 11:39:50 +0700
Vita Prihatoni Purnomo
- XML Converter Wed, 29 Dec 1999 12:05:42 +0800
W. Eliot Kimber
- Re: Draft of Paper: Using UML to Define XML DTDs Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:24:10 -0600
- Draft of Paper: Using UML to Define XML DTDs Sat, 15 Jan 2000 11:28:34 -0600
- Re: Survey: Catalysis Templates Wed, 29 Dec 1999 10:51:22 -0600
Warren Hedley
- Hyphens vs underscores in element names Wed, 26 Jan 2000 18:26:22 +1300
Wo Chang, x3439
- relation between CSS & XSL Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:30:04 -0500 (EST)
Éric Riblair
- An XML catalog is a good idea ... Sun, 16 Jan 2000 14:52:46 -0500

Last message date: Sat 31 Jan 1970 - 23:23:26 GMT
Archived on: Mon Jan 31 2000 - 23:23:38 GMT

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
Other mail archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Jan 31 2000 - 23:23:38 GMT

xml-dev-Jan-2000By Author

xml-dev-Jan-2000
By Author